Movies and the Meaning of Life: Philosophers Take on Hollywood

"The that means of existence is the main pressing of questions," stated the existentiallist philosopher Albert Camus. And no much less a thinker than Woody Allen has wondered:"How is it attainable to discover which means in a finite global, given my waist and blouse size?"
"Movies and the which means of lifestyles" appears at well known and cult video clips, analyzing their assumptions and insights on meaning-of-life questions: what's truth and the way am i able to understand it? (The Truman exhibit, touch, Waking Life); How do i locate myself and my real id? (Fight membership, Being John Malkovich, Boys do not Cry, Memento); How do i locate which means from my interactions with others? (Pulp Fiction, Shadowlands, Chasing Amy); what's the leader objective in existence? (American good looks, existence is gorgeous, The Shawshank Redemption); and the way ought I dwell my existence? (Pleasantville, Spiderman, Minority record, Groundhog Day).

Show description

Quick preview of Movies and the Meaning of Life: Philosophers Take on Hollywood PDF

Best Film books

Conquest of the Useless: Reflections from the Making of Fitzcarraldo

“Hypnotic…. it really is ever tempting to attempt to fathom his stressed spirit and his decision to problem destiny. ”—Janet Maslin, ny Times Werner Herzog (Grizzly guy) is likely one of the such a lot respected and enigmatic filmmakers of our time, and Fitzcarraldo is one in every of his such a lot venerated and renowned films. More than just Herzog’s magazine of the making of the enormous, frustrating movie, which concerned, between different issues, significant solid alterations and reshoots, and the hauling (without using lighting tricks) of a 360-ton steamship over a mountain , Conquest of the dead is  a piece of artwork unto itself, an Amazonian fever dream that emerged from the delirium of the jungle.

Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays

Just about all scholars have noticeable 2001, yet nearly none comprehend its inheritance, its complexities, and positively now not its ironies. The essays during this assortment, commissioned from a wide selection of students, study intimately quite a few attainable readings of the movie and its historic context. additionally they research the movie as a style piece--as the summa of technology fiction that at the same time seems to be again at the technological know-how fiction conventions of the prior (Kubrick all started taking into account creating a technology fiction movie throughout the genre's heyday within the fifties), rethinks the conference in gentle of the time of the film's production, and in flip alterations the glance and that means of the style that it revived--which now is still as widespread because it was once virtually 4 a long time in the past.

Silencing Cinema: Film Censorship around the World (Global Cinema)

Oppression by means of censorship impacts the movie way more often than the other mass media. together with essays through top movie historians, the e-book bargains groundbreaking ancient study on movie censorship in significant movie creation nations and discover such leading edge topics as movie censorship and authorship, faith, and colonialism.

The Columbia Companion to American History on Film

American heritage has regularly been an impossible to resist resource of idea for filmmakers, and this day, for reliable or sick, so much Americans'sense of the prior most likely comes extra from Hollywood than from the works of historians. In very important motion pictures corresponding to The delivery of a country (1915), Roots (1977), Apocalypse Now (1979), and Saving deepest Ryan (1998), how a lot is leisure and what sort of is rooted in ancient truth?

Extra resources for Movies and the Meaning of Life: Philosophers Take on Hollywood

Show sample text content

Discovering the consolations of religion empty, he turns into confident that it's all a bloody lousy mess, not anything extra. “I’ve simply arise opposed to a bit event, Warnie,” he confides to his brother (played via Edward Hardwicke). “Experience is a brutal instructor, yet you examine. My God, you examine! ” a pal attempts to convenience Lewis through reminding him that we see so little the following, and merely God is aware why these items take place. Lewis replies, “God is aware, yet does God care? . . . No, we’re the creatures, aren’t we? We’re the rats within the cosmic lab oratory. i've got doubtless that the scan is for our personal sturdy, however it nonetheless makes God the vivisectionist, doesn’t it? ” detect that Lewis doesn't lose his religion. in its place he deals a poignant instance of an individual of religion who's wrestling with the discomfort of unanswered prayer. And once we give it some thought, we detect that it's only the spiritual believers who quite need to fight with this challenge. Atheists can and do fight with ache and ache, yet to whom can they bitch? For why may still it's any various? The believer, although, faces the entire brunt of the problem. The believer can both surrender her religion altogether, or attempt to come to phrases with the existential fight and inevitable cognitive dissonance that comes from attempting to make experience of such likely unnecessary anguish in an international that was once created via a loving God. For her the query of why God permits such evil to persist is nearly insuperable. The very danger that there's an final resolution to the matter of Evil of which we're at the moment ignorant makes all of it the tougher to swallow. For Lewis, rejecting trust in God is absolutely not an choice. either his mind and his mind's eye element to theism. another choice will be to reject the conventional figuring out of God’s nature. If God isn't absolutely robust (omnipotent) or absolutely strong (omni-benevolent), then there's no challenge of Evil, for he simply will possibly not have the ability or will to do except create a less than perfect international with imperfect creatures. Harold Kushner, in his ebook Why undesirable issues ensue to strong humans, questions God’s omnipotence, claiming that there are easily a few issues that God can’t do, like heal sure ailments. Kushner claims that he’d relatively think in a less-than-all-powerful God, than one that is so merciless as to permit teenagers to undergo and die for a few exalted goal. even though Lewis doesn’t cross that path, he's tempted by way of the prospect that God isn't really, in spite of everything, reliable, or if God is sweet, his goodness is so past our comprehension as people that we don't even realize it as such. Lewis turns into haunted by way of photographs of God as divine vivisectionist or cosmic sadist. ache Over safeguard in a single of the final scenes of Shadowlands, Lewis unearths Douglas, Joy’s son (played by means of Joseph Mazzello), and talks with him approximately his mother’s contemporary dying. now not figuring out what to claim to the younger boy, Lewis had refrained from announcing something in any respect. “Jack,” Douglas finally asks, “Do you suspect in heaven? ” After just a moment’s pause, Lewis solutions, “Yes, I do.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.78 of 5 – based on 46 votes